Cylinder comparison Vespa PX200 - Malossi Sport 210 - VMC Ranger 213 - Quattrini M244

Cylinder comparison Vespa PX200: Original PX200 vs. Malossi Sport 210 vs. VMC Ranger 213 vs. Quattrini M244

You ride a Vespa PX200 and simply want a bit more power and speed – without building a full-on race engine?

What can I expect when I install one of these cylinders on my engine, what is required for it and what will the result be? In this article we compare three of the most popular BigBlock conversion cylinders for the PX200 with the original cylinder:

  • Malossi Sport 210
  • VMC Ranger 213
  • Quattrini M244

Dyno test

All three candidates were tested on our new, very precise Amerschläger P4 dyno – completely out of the box, i.e. without any cylinder machining. This is not a highly scientific lab comparison, as we ran the cylinders on different engines, but a very practice-oriented assessment of where the journey leads with the individual concepts.

Video of the cylinder comparison

Four engines at a glance

Cylinder Vehicle Power Torque Character
Piaggio 200 cc original Vespa Rally200 / PX200 11 hp 15.5 Nm Nice to ride, but with little in reserve
Malossi Sport 210 Vespa PX Nato olive (Rally200 engine case) 20 hp 23 Nm Broad powerband, very usable in everyday riding, quiet
VMC Ranger 213 Vespa PX silver (PX200 engine case) 22.5 hp 26 Nm Noticeably stronger, sporty, still good for touring
Quattrini M244 Vespa PX brown (Pinasco engine case) 27 hp 28 Nm Very wide powerband, clearly more focused on performance

Test scenario

Power measurement:

The power was measured in third gear in each case. The dyno determines the engine torque by measuring the acceleration of the 250 kg dyno drum via the rear wheel. The engines remain exactly as they are ridden on the road. That means no carb top or air filter was removed in order to counteract any potential enrichment of the engine caused by the lower load on the dyno.

Reading the diagrams

Dash line: ---------- Power at the rear wheel
Dotted lines: -*-*-*-*- Torque at the rear wheel.
We are not showing 'embellished' values of a back-calculated engine output, but what is actually delivered to the rear wheel.

On the horizontal axis you have engine rpm, on the vertical axis power and torque. The speed shown in the individual graphs (scaled over rpm) therefore corresponds to the (theoretical) top speed in third gear. In the speed graphs over all four gears, you see the top speed actually reached on the dyno. This also represents only a theoretical value (without headwind/road load); more on that in the video.

Is this actually durable?

If you are not yet deeply rooted in the Vespa scene, you will probably ask yourself in advance: “Is all this really worth it – and will it last?” The 200 cc Vespa engines in particular have the reputation of being indestructible and are often used for round-the-world trips.

Is the engine still just as durable after a conversion? Our clear answer: a definite yes. We are not saying this because we want to sell products, but out of sheer conviction. We ourselves ride engines like this every day. It quickly adds up to 10,000 km and more per year – under full load, not cruising gently.

What matters to us: When we talk about an increase in power, the result must be usable in the long term. For this reason, instead of the term “tuning”, we prefer to talk about “conversion”. In the true sense, tuning means fine adjustment – in everyday language, however, it often stands for crude modifications aimed solely at peak power.

A well-converted engine therefore not only includes the power-increasing parts, but above all the components that improve durability and safety: clutch, crankshaft, gaskets as well as tyres and brakes.

The 200 cc engines are based in design terms on the old 125/150 cc engines. You might think that, with standard displacement and power output, they are already at their limit. Fortunately, these engines were designed back then with large safety reserves. The result: This engine concept can cope with a significant increase in power without complaint – provided the engine is built properly and fitted with high-quality components.

Durability conclusion: If you overhaul carefully and do not save money in the wrong places, you will enjoy a significantly more powerful engine for a long time.

Recommendations for a durable conversion

Crankshaft

The central component of a solid conversion is the choice of crankshaft. In a Vespa rotary valve engine it not only provides stroke, but also largely defines the inlet timing.

The stock PX200 crankshaft from Piaggio is very robust and can handle around 20 hp permanently. In practice, however, most original cranks already have many kilometres and long periods of inactivity behind them – which takes its toll on the big end bearing. On top of that, the inlet timing of the stock crank is extremely conservative.

A BGM PRO Touring crankshaft solves several problems at once: high-alloy forged steel instead of simple case-hardened steel, precisely machined bearing surfaces, forged conrod with silver steel cages, widened inlet web, larger oil seal seat and a specially secured crank pin. Together with an inlet profile optimised in many tests, it forms an extremely solid basis for strong touring engines.

Clutch

To put the increased power onto the road in a controllable way, an uprated clutch is practically mandatory. In principle, both the old 7-spring type and the later Cosa clutch can be adapted – but often at the cost of high lever effort or increased wear on hub and basket.

A BGM Superstrong clutch is a clear recommendation here: designed for well over 40 hp, can be fine-tuned to the intended use via the choice of springs and is still easy to operate. A sports clutch with an extremely wide usable range – without the pitfalls of a pure racing clutch.

Gaskets and oil seals

The be-all and end-all of a clean engine build are high-quality gaskets. BGM PRO oil seals use FKM/Viton®, are alcohol-resistant and very durable. In combination with the BGM PRO engine gaskets made of high-quality gasket paper with a silicone coating, the engine remains leak-free and reliable in operation over the long term.

Primary drive / cush drive

The primary drive between clutch and gearbox is designed at the factory for around 12 hp. With a strong cylinder, this power quickly doubles – including significantly higher torque peaks.

The cush drive springs of the primary drive must be matched to this additional load, otherwise load peaks are passed on unfiltered to the gearbox. Reinforced BGM PRO primary springs are available as an upgrade kit with plates and rivets. If you also want to change the overall gearing, you can choose the straight-cut BGM PRO primary drive. It relieves the engine casing of axial forces and, thanks to its special tooth profile, is still as quiet as the original helical gear.

Ignition

The stock PX ignition is basically excellent and can be retained. In combination with a BGM PRO flywheel or a BGM PRO ProRev ignition, overall performance can be improved even further – while maintaining a stable ignition characteristic.

What you should not do

Install a cylinder “plug & play” into a non-overhauled engine

For the cylinders presented here to realise their potential, a larger effective inlet time-area is essential. With a stock crankshaft and unmodified inlet window, you not only lack peak power, but also low-end torque and pull.

On top of that, the true mileage of an old original crank is usually unknown. Any increase in power should therefore always be based on a freshly overhauled engine. Defective oil seals can otherwise lead to air leaks, a lean mixture and engine damage. BGM PRO engine overhaul kits provide a solid foundation here.

In the same step, the rotary valve inlet can be adjusted. This is not strictly necessary if you are not chasing the last horsepower. Touring-capable PX200 engines run very well with inlet timings of around 110–120° before TDC and 55–70° after TDC. The important factor is the effective time-area – not the exact degree figure after the decimal point.

Blindly fitting a large carburettor

The very short inlet tract of PX engines, combined with the asymmetrical rotary valve, allows comparatively small carburettor cross-sections. The stock SI 24/24 is absolutely sufficient for 99 % of touring setups – even well over 30 hp have already been achieved with it.

Carburettors with 30 mm and more usually require a significantly longer intake tract due to space constraints – the advantage of the larger cross-section is thus partly eaten up again. Even an SI 28 often brings only a small increase in performance compared with the SI 24 as long as the inlet is not heavily reworked.

For a start, it is advisable to keep the stock air filter. It restricts surprisingly little, yet provides a very forgiving base for jetting. If you remove it and replace it with a bellmouth, the air correction must be adjusted accordingly – otherwise there is a risk of lean running under load.

Engine build – how much wrenching experience do you need?

Anyone who feels confident overhauling an engine can also implement the engine concepts presented here. In principle, with none of the three conversion cylinders is machining of the engine casing strictly necessary. If you want to optimise performance, you can additionally work on the inlet tract – but it is not mandatory.

Vespa PX Nato olive: Malossi Sport 210 – the strong 120 km/h worry-free engine

Power curve Malossi Sport 210 vs. Rally 200

The heart of the setup used here is a BGM PRO Touring long-stroke crankshaft with 60 mm stroke and 128 mm conrod.

This crankshaft is actually intended for the large 232–244 cc cylinders from VMC/Quattrini, but is deliberately combined here with a “normal” consumer cylinder. This was done on purpose to examine the effects of the longer conrod on smoothness, power output, character, etc. It is installed with the help of an adapter kit from PX 125 to 210 cc, whose plate was modified so that it only serves as a spacer (stud threads in the plate drilled out and extra-long Piaggio Quasar studs used). To compensate for the longer stroke, an aluminium spacer at the cylinder head with a thickness of 2.0 mm was also used.

Due to the longer conrod, the cylinder sits around 15 mm higher, the pre-compression is reduced and the resonance frequency of the inlet (theoretically) shifts downwards. In practice, however, the differences in the power and torque curves are surprisingly small compared with a conventional crank with 60 mm stroke and the 110 mm conrod suitable for the setup. The engine nevertheless feels different subjectively, as the dyno only records full-throttle runs. How the engine feels with only a small slide opening on the carburettor cannot be represented this way (or only with considerable effort). The conversion noticeably broadens the powerband at low rpm, the engine can, similar to a car, drop very far in the rev range without needing a downshift. At the same time it responds very smoothly and linearly to every millimetre of throttle movement with increasingly controllable and strong thrust. In short: At no point do you get the feeling of too little torque or power. The engine always pulls and therefore provides a huge amount of riding fun.

Test results Red: Malossi Sport, black: PX200 original.
The red Malossi curve simply leaves the stock engine standing: powerband width, low-end torque, midrange, upper rpm range – just everything...
At 6,000 rpm – roughly 100 km/h – the Malossi delivers around 10 Nm more than the stock engine. Overall, the Malossi engine throws around 70 % more power across the usable range.

What does the Malossi engine feel like?

In short: a dream.
The engine has power immediately and at all times. As soon as you move the throttle even a millimetre, the engine pushes hard. This is an effect of the mild port timings. Already at 60 km/h in fourth gear it pulls strongly and the pull only starts to fade slowly around 110–115 km/h.

Touring mode: on!

Despite the deliberately long gearing, you can shift up through the gears at very low speeds in normal city traffic. Shift points: second gear at 20 km/h, third at 30 km/h and from 40 km/h onwards fourth gear can already be used fully – lazy shifting with a very confident feel.

Race mode: on!

However, because the engine has a significantly wider powerband than the original, you can also rev through the gears much further if required: 1st gear up to 40 km/h, 2nd gear up to 70 km/h, 3rd gear up to 95 km/h.


Vespa PX Nato olive with Malossi Sport 210 on the road

On the road this results in a sustained cruising speed of around 120 km/h, and on the motorway even higher speeds are usually possible over long distances. At the same time, the engine remains quiet, pulls smoothly and is very easy to modulate – ideal as a year-round setup.

With around 4.5–5 litres of fuel consumption, near-stock peripherals (air filter, SI 24, box exhaust) and an output of 20 hp / 23 Nm, the Malossi daily engine is technically unspectacular, but extremely well rounded in total.

Setup: Vespa PX Nato olive – Malossi Sport 221 cc (20 hp / 23 Nm)

Vespa PX silver: VMC Ranger 213 – more punch with a similar concept

Walter’s silver PX uses an original PX200 engine case and the VMC Ranger 213 – a cylinder deliberately designed as a competitor to the Malossi Sport 210. Port timings, large transfer areas and a well-designed combustion chamber follow the same basic idea: lots of usable torque with moderate port timings.

Concept comparison Malossi 210 vs VMC 213

The decisive difference lies in the exhaust port: the VMC uses a significantly larger exhaust-port width than the Malossi (approx. 54 % vs. 60 % chord). Together with 180/120 ° port timings, this gives the Ranger a clear performance advantage without making the engine unrideable or extremely high-revving.

In this setup the VMC runs without an air filter but with a bellmouth, and also uses a Polini Box. This makes the power curve similar to that of the Malossi setup, but with noticeably more thrust across the entire relevant rev range. The missing air filter and the slightly larger carburettor (SI 26) certainly contribute to the VMC’s performance advantage, but only in the decimal region.

VMC explicitly advises against modifying the special contour of the exhaust port: a small “hump” behind the upper exhaust edge is said to play a major role in the positive power curve. So if you like grinding ports, you should be deliberately restrained with the Ranger.

Setup: Vespa PX silver – VMC Ranger 213 (22.5 hp / 26 Nm)

Vespa PX brown: Quattrini M244 – the strong touring and performance engine

The brown PX is powered by the now almost legendary Quattrini M244. Originally designed as an M232 plug-and-play setup, around 22 hp at the rear wheel were already possible with a 57 mm stroke. The later 244 cc version adds a clear margin on top – but normally requires more work, especially on the engine casing.

This engine uses a Pinasco Master rotary-valve engine case. Thanks to the BGM PRO Touring crankshaft (60 mm / 128 mm) used, the usual machining of the small engine half is not needed, as Quattrini prescribes for its own crankshaft. The result is a highly durable touring and performance setup that has already covered many thousands of kilometres, including Alpine trips under full load, without any problems.

Concept comparison Malossi 210 vs VMC 213 vs M244 vs PX200

In the setup shown here, the Posch Resi Box dominates – an exhaust system that is significantly more rpm-hungry than the Polini Box. The Quattrini makes excellent use of this: power is available up to over 8,500 rpm without the engine falling flat at low rpm. Initial torque is already very high from around 3,500 rpm, which is remarkable for a rotary-valve engine in this power class.

The Pinasco SI 28 carburettor used is, from the rider’s perspective, “actually not necessary”, but stays because the setup is cleanly dialled in. This matches our experience: On PX rotary-valve engines, a larger carburettor bore often brings less than expected if you do not significantly rework the inlet.

All in all, the M244 offers a significantly broader powerband than the Malossi Sport and the Ranger and clearly takes the lead in terms of performance – both on paper and on the road. The higher cost is offset by noticeably better overall performance. And if you want to go further later on, the Quattrini provides an extremely solid base.

Setup: Vespa PX brown – Quattrini M244 (27 hp / 28 Nm)

Which cylinder suits which rider?

Malossi Sport 210 – relaxed daily and year-round engine

  • Ideal if you ride a lot in everyday traffic – even in bad weather.
  • Pleasant power delivery, quiet, very easy to control.
  • Moderate fuel consumption, runs with largely stock peripherals.
  • Perfect if you want an “understated” but significantly stronger all-round engine.

VMC Ranger 213 – the strong sporty all-rounder

  • More power and torque than the Malossi with a similar basic concept.
  • Exhaust-port layout with approx. 60 % chord provides noticeable extra shove.
  • Very suitable for touring with a box exhaust, but with a clearly sportier character.
  • Suitable for riders who want a very torquey setup with manageable extra effort.

Quattrini M244 – for ambitious touring and performance fans

  • Significantly higher power (approx. 27 hp / 28 Nm) with a very wide usable band.
  • High long-distance durability with the right peripherals – including long trips and Alpine passes.
  • Higher investment, but noticeably more reserves and expansion stages upwards.
  • Recommended if you want a strong yet touring-capable engine with future potential.


Here is a direct comparison of all four engine concepts, measured across all four gears – just as you would accelerate through the gears on the road.

Note: The green curve does not correspond to the original 200 cc engine shown above. In this case a BGM 200 cylinder was used, a slightly stronger replica of the stock cylinder, together with a first-generation BGM Big Box Touring exhaust. Power is therefore higher here, but the width of the band over speed is very similar to the stock engine and thus still very useful for comparison.

Concept comparison Malossi 210, VMC 213, M244 and PX200 over speed

Conclusion and recommendation

Malossi Sport 210 and VMC Ranger 213 are excellent candidates for everyday PX200 engines that can also be realised as simple plug-and-play setups. With targeted work on the engine casing, transfer ports and inlet (time-area), there is still considerable additional potential.

The Quattrini M244 plays half a class to a full class above that: it is more expensive, but – especially in combination with the BGM crankshaft without the need for casing machining – offers an extremely strong and expandable base. If you are prepared to invest a bit more and want to build an engine with a genuine long-term perspective, this is your best choice.

In short:

  • Lots of everyday riding, all year, low profile: Malossi Sport 210.
  • Sporty all-rounder with more punch: VMC Ranger 213.
  • Ambitious touring and performance with reserves: Quattrini M244.

The dyno graphs and riding impressions in the cylinder comparison video will further help you find the concept that suits you best.

Autor
Uwe Schneider
Hannes
05.12.2025 08:32
Servus Uwe, im Video kündigst du alle Setups auf SI24 an, in der Beschreibung stehen si24, 26 und 28 mit Bedüsungen, welche Vergaser sind nun die Bedüsungsreferenz?
Im Leistungsdiagram stehen auch überall die 24er Vergaser...Danke für einen Klmmentar dazu!